Date: Thursday, August 28th Time: 1:00pm Notetaker: Oliver Starkey
Review
Documentation Note: After W4 - Stand Up we decided to move away from the table format, so we can more easily include more information for the Stand-Up review.
Zoy
Please note that Zoy had an exam the week this stand-up corresponds to, so that limited her work output on this project.
Focus
- Research on similar products and potential users
- Understanding team workflows and project structure
- Initial backend setup and tech stack familiarization
What’s done
- Researched existing products and potential customer needs
- Got familiar with how the team is managing tasks and documentation
- Looked into backend tools/services likely to be used in this project
What’s next
- Assist with UI design requirements gathering and asset preparation
- Contribute to documentation updates (e.g. decision logs, user stories)
- Share initial research findings and insights
Blockers
- Still clarifying which backend or UI areas need the most help
- Need more alignment with team on documentation structure
Alex
Focus
- Front-end prototype
What’s done?
- Desktop UI (specifically maps)
What’s next?
- Continue
- Help in areas the team needs help
Blockers?
- None
Matthew
Focus
- Figma UI design (high-fidelity)
What’s done?
- Working on the map filtering UI
- Decisions relating to broader map UI
What’s next?
- Work on getting frontend codebase setup
Blockers?
- Struggled to come up with good icons for the different types of map UI
Julian
Focus
- Documentation deployment
- Backend design
What’s done?
- Compiling the Obsidian to the web
- Tested with Jekyll
- Landed on Quartz 4 as it’s more Obsidian-specific
- Got this working locally (identified need for
index
file)
- Researched backend design
What’s next?
- Finish Quartz setup
- Set up GitHub Actions workflow to run on
push
events to the documentation branch and deploy updated site automatically
- Set up GitHub Actions workflow to run on
- Research backend
- May work on getting AWS services set up
- Document some backend choices
Blockers?
- None
Oliver
Focus
- Getting things together for the Progress Checklist with a primary focus on artefacts
What’s done?
- Wrote a draft of the Breakdown of Reqs
- Draft of new-high-level-arch.pdf
- Draft of wireframe-app-setup.pdf
- General obsidian tidy-up (added more draft decision records)
What’s next?
- Organise team review of the Requirement Breakdown (possibly clients too?)
- Team review for the high-level-sys-architecture (especially with @Julian for backend technologies)
- Review wireframe with team → work on getting to a finalised mockup/prototype stage ready for coding
- Continue to make sure the team is on track for the progress checklist
Blockers?
- Still a bit sure on the best way to go about contacting the clients
- Don’t wan’t to go to far ahead on some of these things with out team/client feedback
- Not really a blocker, but would love to see more people using the Obsidian vault!
Questions
- What is the best way to contact the clients? (Where is the Google Doc?)
- ANS: It’s been setup but not shared with us yet (waiting client confirmation)
Action Items
- Deploy documentation
- Team review of Breakdown of Reqs
- Break down into User Stories
- Team review of high-lvl-system-arch.pdf
- Needs justification written
- Team review of wireframe-app-setup.pdf
- Needs justification written (why certain decisions)
- Move to high-fidelity prototype
- Backfill W3-sprint-planning.pdf document (@Julian)
- Backfill Decision Log (some for @Julian, some for @Matthew)
- Code setup (proper README, basic framework setup)
- Make sure git contribution guidelines is complete
- Testing and deployment documentation